PowerAthleteHQ.com will be under some much needed maintenance over the next few days. We apologize in advance if you experience some down time during your browsing.
Thanks, The PowerAthleteHQ.com Team


Luke, Denny, and Steve break down international certs, world domination, and help a misguided soul. Its people helping people on this episode of Power Athlete Radio.

Show Timeline

  • 0:00 Intro and opening
  • 2:22 How was the UK
  • 7:37 The Nebraska Circuit
  • 11:21 Update on ideal duration of CFFB Amateur Progression
  • 21:55 What exactly does world domination look like?
  • 34:30 EJ Asks: What's the best way to get bigger stronger and faster?
  • 45:59 Fantasy Football chatter and closing

Show Notes

EJ Watson asks:

Good afternoon,

First, let me tell you how much I appreciate the Power Athlete Radio series. I can't tell you how much more entertaining the ride to work is. I'm looking for some advice and I'm hoping you can point me in the right direction. I'm 30, 197 lbs, 20% body fat, no serious history of injuries. I started lifting my junior year of college, played Rugby and boxed. I continued to play Rugby after college and became more proficient at my lifts. Here I am now with two kids and I've sort of hit an impasse-- I'm looking to increase my level of fitness. I am reading both K-Star and BMack's new books and I may have information overload. If I were to ask what I'm training for, I guess I want to get back into shape for Rugby. I want to increase my lifts, cut my times, and jump my lung. I know there is no secret squirrel, but what should I do? Follow CFFB? CFE? Mainsite? Is there some odd combo there that I can pull? Help me Obi-Wan Kenobi, you're my only hope.

Thanks Guys. Keep up the good work,


Luke Summers
Follow me...

Luke Summers

Luke has been training athletes in CrossFit, Weightlifting, and Olympic Lifting since 2007. He spent 6 years pushing pencils in “Corporate America,” spending 3 of those years moonlighting as a Strength & Conditioning Coach before and after work. Luke was an athlete his whole life and played multiple sports, but his primary focus was football.He played up through college until a neck injury forced him to hang it up. He travels with the CrossFit Football staff and has coaches a variety of athletes from amateur to professional levels in football, baseball, and track.
Luke Summers
Follow me...

Posted in Blog, Featured, Radio | Tagged , , , | 9 Comments


  1. Ingo B

    Weight numbers vs. performance – this may be an ongoing uphill struggle. Seems like the majority of the folks who use the program are converted Crossfitters, whose performance IS measured by weight numbers. In other words, unless they actually play a sport, the program is their end goal. This was wildly obvious at the cert I attended.

  2. Ingo B

    Also, I am one of those formerly untrained folks. Prior to Crossfit, all I did were plyos, bodyweight stuff, and yes, cable pulldowns. I’ve been diligent about tracking my progress via Behind the Whiteboard, so I can dig up stats if it helps your guys’ quest. Just let me know what you need.

  3. Brian Howard

    Thanks for the podcast guys. I have been following the site and listening to the podcasts and discussions for a while. I attended the cert in Northampton last week and I found all the talks fascinating. There was a huge range of people and they had travelled from all over.

    One thing I noticed was that you could tell the people who had prior background or knowledge of strength and conditioning from those who had no sporting background except that of cross fit. I remember at one point in particular that John said that an athlete shouldn’t squat below parallel if they didn’t have sufficient range of motion and weren’t able to maintain correct posture/spinal stability. I could see looking across the room that this absolutely blew some people’s minds. It contradicted everything they had learned about squatting from Crossfit and seemed to go against everything they understood to be true. I just thought this chimed in with Luke’s comment that the guys still had lots of explaining to do at the end of the seminar.

    I personally found it hugely informative and I’m sure I missed loads of great stuff. I’ll have to sit down and go through all the notes from the weekend to try and remember everything.

    Thanks for the podcast and the whole programme.


  4. dredlocked

    Just filled up the last page of my notebook the other day. Nothing beats the black-and-white spotted ones from CVS, don’t have to worry about getting it dirty, and just enough space to get all the info in.

    Luke: Don’t have it digitized, but I’ve been on and off CFFB for a while now and have a notebook full of info. If it can help you guys at all let me know and I’ll throw it into a more usable format for you guys.

    • Awesome show, gentlemen. Couple notes for the audience:

      1. The Nebraska Circuit they are referring to can be found here!

      2. Van Halen came out with ‘Van Halen Best Of, Volume 1’, and never came out with a Volume 2…

  5. TRuss

    Re: the duration of the Amateur progression, you note that you don’t run across many untrained athletes in your gym. Presume the same would hold true for the substantial majority of folks who come to CFFB. The question then is why program for that untrained individual that rarely accesses the site? I’m not suggesting dumping the linear progression at all. New to CFFB? Good. Do the LP for 20 weeks (or whatever) to get acquainted with the program and the basic lifts and don’t worry so much about “adaptation.” At that point, CFFB suggests moving on to the Collegiate template. If an athlete chooses to stay at Amateur, it’s going to be his/her call when to move up. Save yourselves some brain damage trying to design the perfect program for 1000s of different snowflakes that come to the program.

    • TRuss,
      Untrained = untrained in our method. Don’t confuse “CrossFitting for 3 years” or “Body building for 18 months” as trained. In the global vernacular, yeah I guess you could say they’ve been exercising which people confuse for training, but they are not “trained” in our eyes.

      A majority of the folks who jump on CFFB and decide to start following the program have never consistently attacked a linear progression, and rode it out to completion. Thus, they start on a linear progression.

      The athletes we currently work with and test on have all exhausted a linear progression, so we can’t “go back” and test.

      Hope that makes sense.

  6. TRuss

    Yep. Tough mission…

  7. captawesome

    I have some data from myself and my training partner who I got to start following CFFB with me when I started playing rugby again. Both former collegiate athletes (rugby for myself, and football for my buddy). Both experienced some serious “de-training” through our military endeavors and life in general. We both keep a pretty decent log of our training and can show the change in lifts over time. Anything to improve the process in the long run…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *